![]() He claims his purpose in writing The Irrational Atheist is ‘not to defend God, or even to argue for the truth of my particular religious faith’ (p. However, Day’s lack of formal qualification does not affect the quality of his arguments, for the most part, in his book. He is a video game designer, blogger, 1 and columnist, 2 who claims no intellectual achievement except ‘to have once convinced Michelle Malkin to skip an opportunity to promote herself’ (p. his biography lists no higher education, in fact. 1) whose pen name is a play on the Latin for ‘Voice of God’. That is hardly the sort of opening one expects from a self-described ‘non-denominational evangelical Christian’ (p. ![]() … Your soul is not my responsibility’ (p. ![]() Excellent refutation of ‘new atheists’ flawed by heterodox open theismĪ review of The Irrational Atheist: Dissecting the Unholy Trinity of Dawkins, Harris, and Hitchens by Vox Day ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |